During Vietnam’s COVID-19 lockdowns last year, blogger Bui Van Thuan took to Facebook to criticize the government’s plan to use soldiers to deliver food to people locked in their homes in Ho Chi Minh City.
Key points:
- Vietnam has arrested dozens of journalists and vloggers for posting on social networks
- Human rights groups worry that “digital repression” could have serious consequences
- Many Asian countries have upcoming elections, prompting further online restrictions
Days later, he was arrested.
Mr. Thuan, 41, a former teacher in the northern province of Hoa Binh, was sentenced last month to eight years in prison and a further five years’ probation for his propaganda.
Vietnamese authorities accused Mr. Thua of “developing, maintaining, disseminating or propagating information, materials and products aimed at opposing the nation.”
According to human rights groups, the charge is increasingly applied to online content as the state exercises greater control over the Internet.
“The Vietnamese government has long controlled traditional media in the country,” said Phil Robertson, deputy Asia director at Human Rights Watch.
“Now they are trying to control the online space.
“They have passed a series of laws to this end and are deploying state mechanisms to go after people online, forcing content moderation and removal decisions on platforms, using cyber trolls and controlling access to the internet.”
Mr. Thuan is the latest target of Vietnam’s internet crackdown, with authorities arresting dozens of journalists and bloggers, including a popular noodle vendor, on similar charges.
Last month, Vietnamese authorities said they were tightening rules to deal with “false” content on social media platforms – so it must be taken down within 24 hours.
This has made the Southeast Asian country one of the world’s most tightly controlled regimes for social media companies.
Still, Vietnam is not alone.
Online censorship reached an all-time high in 2022, with a record number of governments blocking political, social or religious content, according to Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit Freedom House.
The organization’s annual report says growing “digital repression” has serious consequences for fundamental rights, including freedom of expression, access to information and privacy, “especially for people living in authoritarian regimes”.
“In some countries, it’s about limiting the voices of political dissidents, activists and others critical of the government,” said Damar Juniarto, executive director of the digital rights group Southeast Asia Network for Freedom of Expression (SafeNet).
“But governments also want to control the big tech firms – they see them as too powerful, too influential.”
“Draconian” time frame as governments press
More than three-quarters of the world’s more than 4.5 billion internet users live in countries where authorities punish online expression, according to Freedom House, which rates China as the worst environment for internet freedom.
Elsewhere in Asia, Indonesia adopted rules this year for social media platforms to remove content deemed illegal or “violating public order” within four hours if deemed urgent, and within 24 hours otherwise.
Those who do not comply can face fines, criminal liability or being blocked from the country.
His new criminal code also tightened controls on so-called “fake news” and insulting the president online.
Vietnam’s Minister of Information and Communications, Nguyen Manh Hung, told parliament the new laws are needed because there is a risk that “fake news will spread too widely if it is handled slowly.”
Companies that do not adhere to the specified times may be banned from their platforms.
Meanwhile, Singapore passed an online safety bill last month that would require social media sites to block “harmful content” within hours.
In October, India said it would set up a government panel to investigate user complaints about content moderation decisions by social media platforms that have raised concerns about censorship.
And in Thailand, a new law that took effect this month allows authorities to force online service providers and social media platforms to take down content within 24 hours without a court order.
Digital rights groups Access Now and Article 19 said in a statement that the short time frame for removal was “mysterious” and “puts undue time pressure on platforms to respond, prompting them to err on the side of caution.”
Thai authorities have said the new rules are necessary for national security and “public safety” purposes.
Growing Asian markets for social media
Popular Asian countries constitute large markets for social media platforms.
In India, Facebook has more than 400 million users and YouTube about 500 million. Indonesia has about 176 million Facebook users and about 139 million YouTube users.
According to SafeNet’s Juniarto, the crackdown on online content that has accelerated in the name of curbing disinformation during the pandemic is an attempt by Asian governments to rein in big tech firms.
“With elections approaching in several countries, we can expect to see more restrictions online,” he said.
“For platforms, these are large and growing markets, so they will have to think about how to manage these new regulations and greater government controls.”
Facebook’s parent company Meta and Alphabet’s YouTube did not respond to requests for comment on the new laws.
Company officials previously told Reuters they were concerned about compliance with online content and possible government overreach.
Trinh Thi Nhung, Mr Thuan’s wife, said officials in Vietnam were “obviously toughened” by the new rules.
According to her, she restricted her posts about her husband on social media and she and her family were monitored online and offline.
“I am very worried about it,” said Ms Nhung, who sells honey for a living.
Vietnamese authorities said they found more than 100 articles posted by Mr Thuan on two Facebook accounts, more than two dozen of which were “anti-state”.
Mrs. Nhung said authorities could not prove the Facebook account they cited in the charges belonged to her and claimed her husband was innocent.
“I’m very sad, but I don’t regret his actions,” she said, adding that it was difficult to be separated from Mr Thuan with her seven-year-old daughter.
“I will always support him because I trust him and I am proud of him.”
Reuters