Bitcoin Bridged on Avalanche Exceeds Value Locked in Lightning Network – Bitcoin News

Members of the crypto community are discussing the number of bitcoins that have been switched to the Avalanche network, which now exceeds the total value locked in the Lightning Network. At the time of writing, there are 5,493 bitcoins in circulation on the Avalanche blockchain, while the Lightning Network holds 5,248 bitcoins.

Avalanche Bridge Bitcoin Number Exceeds Lightning Network Capacity

Last week, digital currency proponents were discussing the increasing number of bitcoin (BTC) switching to the Avalanche (AVAX) network. Seven days ago, the cryptocurrency known as BTCb saw its supply surpass the number of bitcoins locked on the Lightning Network (LN). The reason for the celebration is that LN takes less time to beat its total locked value (TVL) or capacity. At the time of writing, LN has about 5,248 bitcoin TVL, which is worth about $120 million at today’s BTC prices.

Bitcoin Bridged on Avalanche Exceeds Value Locked on Lightning Network

A week ago on January 16th, an Avalanche (AVAX) supporter known as “Ojrdev” tweeted about the number of bitcoins transferred to the AVAX chain. “The Avalanche moved more [bitcoin] (BTCb) is locked [the] Lightning Network,” Ojrdev he tweeted. “The Avalanche consensus mechanism is also faster than Lightning.” Many other AVAX supporters agreed and marked the milestone. While LN currently holds 5,248 BTC, according to, the number of BTCb is around 5,493 BTCb worth $125.5 million at current BTC rates.

Bitcoin Bridged on Avalanche Exceeds Value Locked on Lightning Network

At the same time, the most tokenized bitcoin on any blockchain is the Wrapped Bitcoin project, which uses the Ethereum blockchain network. There are currently 179,697 WBTC in circulation according to the WBTC dashboard. There is also a total of 52,888.86 BTCB deposited on the Binance Smart Chain (BSC). BSC’s bitcoin storage is larger than that housed in AVAX. However, the amount of BTCb is greater than the 3,564 BTC locked on Blockstream’s Liquid Network, as well as the 3,496 RBTC on the RSK network.

The number of tokenized bitcoins hosted on alternative blockchains, networks and sidechains has been growing since 2017, but the pace accelerated further when WBTC launched in 2019. The main goal was to make the end faster and lower operating costs. And in 2020, payments on the Ethereum blockchain grew rapidly. In mid-May 2021, the average ETH fee was around $40 per transaction.

As a result, tokenized bitcoins have migrated to alternative blockchains in addition to LN and Ethereum. The rise of BTCb on AVAX shows that many crypto proponents are finding value in using a pegged version of BTC on an alternative chain. Meanwhile, the sheer number of WBTC in circulation hosted on the Ethereum blockchain has been declining over the past 12 months.

Tags in this story

alternative blockchain, alternative blockchains, alternative chain, Avalanche, Avalanche Blockchain, Avalanche network, AVAX, Binance Smart Chain, Bitcoin, Blockstream, BSC, BTC, BTCB, capacity, circulation, consensus mechanism, Crypto supporters, Ethereum, Ethereum blockchain, payments, finiteness, lightning network, liquid network, ln, networks, Ojrdev, Peg, RSK network, sidechains,, Tokenized Bitcoin, tokenized bitcoins, Transaction Costs, TVL, WBTC, twisted bitcoin

What do you think about the rise of BTCb on the Avalanche network? Share your thoughts and ideas in the comments below.

Jamie Redman

Jamie Redman is Head of News at News and a fintech journalist based in Florida. Redman has been an active member of the cryptocurrency community since 2011. He is passionate about Bitcoin, open source code and decentralized applications. Since September 2015, Redman has written more than 6,000 articles for News about disruptive protocols emerging today.

Image credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons

Refusal: This article is for informational purposes only. This is not a direct offer or an offer to buy or sell or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services or companies. does not provide investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author shall be liable, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use or use of any content, goods or services mentioned in this article. .

Source link