Coca-Cola has been sued over allegations that its Simply Orange Juice contains high levels of toxic perpetual chemicals


Coca-Cola is forever being sued over allegations that Simply Orange Juice contains toxic chemicals.

The lawsuit alleged that the product misled customers by claiming it was an all-natural product.

Third-party testing claimed the juice contained levels of PFAS, known as perennial chemicals, hundreds of times higher than federal limits for drinking water.

Exposure to high levels of PFAS can lead to increased risks of kidney or testicular cancer, fetal complications, liver disease, and increased cholesterol levels.

The lawsuit alleges that the label, which states that the juice is natural, is misleading and deceptive.

Joseph Lurenz filed a complaint against Coca-Cola and Simply Orange Juice on December 28 in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York.

WHAT IS PFAS?

PFAS are man-made chemicals used as oil and water repellents and coatings for common products including cookware, carpets and textiles.

These endocrine disrupting chemicals do not break down when released into the environment and continue to accumulate over time.

PFAS chemicals can contaminate drinking water supplies near facilities where the chemicals are used.

PFAS contamination has been found in water near manufacturing facilities, as well as near military bases and firefighting training facilities where PFAS-containing foam is used.

They also enter the food supply through food packaging materials and contaminated soil.

He said the company misrepresented its products by using phrases such as “just natural,” “nothing to hide” and “all natural” on its labels, even though they contained PFAS.

Mr. Lurenz believes that the defendants knew that the juice contained dangerous chemicals that could pose health risks, but failed to disclose this information to consumers.

He said, “Actually [the] plaintiff’s testing revealed that the product contained per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (“PFAS”), synthetic chemicals that are not naturally occurring.’

The lawsuit said third-party testing emerged PFAS in juice. Specific test results were not provided, but the lawsuit said the levels were “hundreds of times” above federal limits for drinking water.

The limits, which were tightened last summer, are 0.02 ppt for PFOS and 0.004 ppt for PFOA.

The juice is marketed as all-natural and contains the words “simply prepared,” a claim the plaintiff denies.

It is not yet known how PFAS chemicals could contaminate the water used to make the juice, and whether the chemicals could also be in the packaging.

PFAS chemicals are also found in items such as tableware and food packaging, often used for their non-stick, heat-resistant and water-resistant properties.

According to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), PFAS do not break down easily and can accumulate in our bodies and in the environment.

The same properties that make PFAS chemicals useful in products are the same properties that make them dangerous for consumption—the chemicals’ ability to be long-lived and break down slowly.

People can be exposed to PFAS in a variety of ways, although water is considered the primary route.

However, PFAS are also found in air, fish and soil in various parts of the world. There are thousands of PFAS chemicals used to make a variety of products.

It is not yet known how the PFAS chemicals contaminate the water used to make the juice, and whether the chemicals are also present in the packaging.

It is not yet known how the PFAS chemicals contaminate the water used to make the juice, and whether the chemicals are also present in the packaging.

“As one of the most recognizable brands in the world, The Coca-Cola Company knows the importance of marketing and labeling, including the value of the label images they carefully select to place on the product,” the complaint states.

The lawsuit alleges that the product’s branding is designed to increase sales to unsuspecting consumers.

According to the complaint, this is done by targeting health-conscious consumers who believe that orange juice is simply natural and free of synthetic ingredients that are harmful for human consumption.

Testing was done independently to check for PFAS chemicals.

The plaintiff seeks undisclosed monetary damages, brand damages and civil penalties for himself and the class action.

According to one study, drinking orange juice is often considered beneficial for one’s health, as the drink reduces the risk of stroke by about a quarter.

Many people drink orange juice when they have a cold because it is known for its vitamin C content.



Source link