SBF Fights For Robinhood Shares – Says It Needs Them More Than FTX Clients Suffering Only ‘Possibility Of Economic Harm’ – Featured Bitcoin News

Disgraced FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) is trying to regain access to his $460 million-plus Robinhood stake. The former CEO of the collapsed cryptocurrency exchange claimed he needed them to “pay for criminal defense”, stressing that without them the consequences would be severe and “irreparable”. On the other hand, FTX customers “face only the possibility of economic loss,” SBF’s court filing said.

Robinhood stock controversies

FTX co-founder and former CEO Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) is currently trying to regain control of Robinhood shares, which are being contested by several parties, including SBF itself, new FTX management, and bankrupt cryptocurrency lender Blockfi.

Bankman-Fried on Thursday asked the bankruptcy court to deny a motion for an automatic stay (stay action) filed by new FTX management on 56,273,269 shares of Robinhood Markets Inc. (Nasdaq: HOOD ). presentation shows.

The court document details that the former FTC chief “requests that the motion to stay be denied” because the new FTC management “failed to carry its heavy burden of establishing that such an emergency remedy is warranted.” Moreover, the stay offer must be “moot” because the US Department of Justice (DOJ) has obtained a warrant to seize Robinhood shares, the court filing added, adding that new FTX management has not withdrawn the stay offer and appealed to Bankman. To protest fried.

The court filing further explains that SBF is “requiring a portion of these funds to pay for his criminal defense,” arguing that his “financial inability to defend himself has serious consequences and is irreparable.” Documentation in progress:

On the contrary, FTX debtors face only the possibility of economic loss.

Bankman-Fried argued that the Robinhood shares at issue were not owned by Alameda Research or any other entities involved in FTX’s bankruptcy. Instead, they are owned by Emergent Fidelity Technology Ltd, which is 90% owned by him. According to the lawsuit, Bankman-Fried and another FTX executive, Gary Wang, borrowed money from Alameda for Emergent to buy Robinhood shares.

Crypto community outraged by SBF’s statements

Many people on social media are outraged by Bankman-Fried’s claim that it faces greater damages than FTX clients who suffer only from the “possibility of economic loss.”

A man he tweeted: “SBF gives new meaning to chutzpah. Arguing in court, the balance of the shares is weighted in favor of him selling HOOD to pay his legal fees, since prison is an irreparable loss and FTX’s creditors will suffer only an economic loss. Other expressed an opinion:

This is one of the most disgusting lines I have ever read. Associating your name with the claim that debtors’ economic loss is not a matter of life and death for some people is heartless and out of touch. What happened to “There’s nothing more important than keeping customers whole”?

Tags in this story

Alameda Research, DOJ, FTX customers, FTX debtors, FTX users, HOOD stock, Robinhood stock, Sam Bankman-Fried, Sam Bankman-Fried Robinhood stock, sbf, SBF Robinhood stock

What do you think of Sam Bankman-Fried’s claim that he needs Robinhood stock more than FTX clients who only face “possibility of economic loss”? Let us know in the comment section below.

Kevin Helms

Kevin, an Austrian Economics student, discovered Bitcoin in 2011 and has been an evangelist ever since. His interests lie in Bitcoin security, open source systems, network effects, and the intersection of economics and cryptography.

Image credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons

Refusal: This article is for informational purposes only. This is not a direct offer or an offer to buy or sell or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services or companies. does not provide investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author shall be liable, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use or use of any content, goods or services mentioned in this article. .

Source link